[Previous entry: "What is Composition (More)"] [Main Index] [Next entry: "parents"]
05/18/2004 Archived Entry: "plagiarism"
Maybe because a lot of semesters have come to a close recently, but the plagiarism hunters seem to be out in full swing lately on several academic(ish) blogs. Always an odd mix: teachers turned police. Students’ rights dis-assembled. Guilty, guilty, guilty, to quote (without citation) an old Doonsbury strip on Nixon (or was it Reagan?). The prison house of writing, Turnitin.com and its profit hungry clones, take center stage. Lock ‘em up cause they cheated! As righteous as they wanna be, the plagiarism hunters (out on the holy war of cheating, they rely on the habitual “gotcha”) forget a few useful tidbits as they make their mission accomplished and save the world from mis-quoted statements or lifted Internet passages:
Replies: 4 comments
i think i love you ;-)
seriously, bravo!!
Posted by Cindy @ 05/20/2004 11:45 AM EST
Hear hear. Kinda tired of reading and writing about everything the way its "supposed" to be done.
Posted by Neha @ 05/18/2004 09:52 PM EST
"The network could care less about citation."
This is the best statement on plagiarism I've maybe ever heard. Think of Shaviro's Connected. The fact that we live in a network society has interesting implications for something like citation-- and not just the mundane handbook sense of citation in FYC. One of the problems is that "our" sense (in comp) of citation is tied too strongly to intellectual property rights. I'm not saying this shouldn't be an issue. Obviously it is. However, for theorizing citation in a broader way, we should maybe question the (here it comes) articulation of quoting-citation-property. These are three different things that tend to get conflated so much that we can't even see them as separate.
Posted by jenny @ 05/18/2004 03:18 PM EST
And plagiarism is like sex: Let me catch you cheating!
Posted by Will @ 05/18/2004 08:22 AM EST