[Previous entry: "Batman Begins"] [Main Index] [Next entry: "Documenting"]
06/19/2005 Archived Entry: "The Take 'N Use Composition Process"
The Take 'N Use Composition Process
A favorite topic: Rip Mix Burn. This is a question for the rhetorical situation: where is the point where ideas cross/shape/appropriate/steal from each other (a point Jenny has complicated in her work on the rhetorical situation)?
What is the logic of the mix? Art precedes technology (as McLuhan noted). In the age of the network, why resist the logic of art/media?. On WPA-L, I once brought up the question of a culture that already functions this way through the arts: the remake/the repeated plot formula/the sitcom/the cover. Appropriation is no longer something to marvel at. We have grown up with it. So:
A thread on the The Comics Journal message board (via Metafilter). A good example of writing outside the tautology of student writing for its interest in
Doom cheat the game like walk-thru
Run 'em, son 'em like Mr. Rourke do Tattoo
The way alotta clowns get down is unnatural
This flow flip like oranges, apples
Rhymes like limes to a Lemonade Snapple
Leave her at the chapel, don't eat Scrapple
First thing they notice when they come to is they bling is gone
Then they start remembering the Klingon with the rings on
In came the Villain with their own gear like, "Hi, there"
Y'all play the rear, this whole year MY year
Metal face beard like Brillo pad
Y'all know his steelo so don't feel so bad
Seed call him, "Ol' dad," the one the ol' hoe had
Knew he was a winner since a swimmer in the gonads
Not a question of "visual rhetoric" but mixthoric. The solution to our fears of writing? "We are doomed." Really?