My Archives: July 2005

Sunday, July 31, 2005

Imaginary Return
(click through for comments)
statecollege

Posted by jrice @ 02:56 PM EST [Link]

Friday, July 29, 2005

Friday in Images

friday

Posted by jrice @ 09:57 AM EST [Link]

Thursday, July 28, 2005

Competition
I find this article (via BoingBoing) about competition between used books and new books bought online to be revealing. Often, initial reactions to new media developments includes focusing on "competition." This will destroy that, as the popular Hugo saying goes. We see this in P2P (file sharing hurts music sales), allowing texts to be read for free even though there exists a hard copy for sale (like with Cory Doctorow's work), movie downloading (it’s hurting the movie industry), morality (or you have morality by reading, or the new video games destroy your morality) and even pedagogy (new media is hurting writing), etc. The assumption is that what worked in one medium will work the same in another. What we experienced in one situation is what we will experience in another.
What often occurs, however, is that whatever the process is that we've identified, (buying products or even teaching writing), the move to a new environment (like the Web) alters our expectations. We expect music sales to drop if folks can download songs for free. We expect the new book market to be hurt by the increased sales and access to used books. But that doesn't happen. Instead, new types of relationships emerge - music sales still are alive and well/people still download music. In fact, people often do both.
It is that sense of "both" which I am interested in; interested because a notion of "both" is a network idea (it recognizes the complex moves and responses we make to new situations). The idea of a “both” also acts as a disruption of our expectations that all knowledge can be reduced to binary positions. The best example in popular culture/consumerism, which I think Steven Johnson has pointed out already, is DVD/video sales. That you went to the theater to see X often doesn't mean that you won't rent (or buy) X on DVD. I go to the store to rent a movie or TV show and am amazed that certain shows, shows easily seen on basic cable or network TV, are for sale or for rental. Why rent Arrested Development? It's on Sunday on Fox. But people do rent it. More than once. Why buy The Simpsons when you can tape it off your TV? People do buy it. They engage with the feeling of "both."
There are, of course, pedagogical issues directly related to this sense of both. The most obvious is the fetish of “classic” text over “popular culture” (the idea you can’t have both) or alphabetic vs other kinds of texts. And, of course, the question of what a student writes about in a given first year course (always asked to ignore the "both" in favor of the absolute stance).

Posted by jrice @ 11:03 AM EST [Link]

Wednesday, July 27, 2005

Dragonmead
Dragonmead is tucked away off of 696 in Warren. If you drive down the service drive, you'll see it. Not much to look at on the outside; inside it's all beer. Good beer. Plenty to choose from. I don't know if I've seen a brew pub w/this much of its own.
The three of us had samplers first. I stuck to mostly Belgian style. Excellent. The German Wheat: excellent. Except for the Pale Ale, the two American styles weren't as good. Better than what we have in Ferndale, though. Doesn't matter; I wish this place was closer to home. Afterwards, we went for full pints. Back to the Trippel. Damn good. Brought home a growler of Bronze Griffin Belgian Ale. Sorry CBD. I should have taken you here. Next time I'll bring my camera. But for now, I think I've hit the good brew pubs in the metro area (except for Bo's in Pontiac). Dragonmead was my last one. Now I need to hit the West side of Michigan.

Posted by jrice @ 07:05 PM EST [Link]

Tuesday, July 26, 2005

Talking Shops
David Clements Talking Shops: Detroit Commercial Folk Art is a nice collection of the wonderful art that adorns many of the city's walls and storefronts. These paintings are markings of Detroit's imaginary (figures, places, ideas, pride, consumerism, etc.). Engaging with them (as pedestrian, photographer, gawker, tourist) is itself, too, the imaginary gesture. The engagement, the event/encounter, generates the meaning.
This book serves, then, as a sort of tour guide of the imaginary, a street map to find and locate those signs of place which allude us daily (the presence of place that you have to pay attention to as you walk or drive by). I read through the pictures and I want to go to the site, to see if the art is still there. Or, like the "We The People Press" painting on an abandoned building towards the end of Jefferson, I already know that the artwork is long gone; I remember being on that street but a week or so ago, and I remember seeing only a white wall. Some of this is dependent on regret (for so long I meant to take a picture of the “gourmet food” logo on a party store on Livernois. I waited too long. The logo has been painted over). Some of this activity is dependent on romanticism (oh, how lovely). Some on invention (what do I make of these signs/paintings?).
Two spots draw my immediate attention: The Blacktronic Science mural at Mack and Drexel and the rich Eastside Check Cashing mural at E. McNichols. I don't want to know yet that these murals are gone. I want to go there and see if they are gone and what, if anything, has taken their place. That action is a part of the city-imaginary rhetoric vital to digital culture: engagement.

Posted by jrice @ 10:53 AM EST [Link]

Monday, July 25, 2005

Imaginary Maps
Wonderful stuff. I get inspired.
Click through to see notes (and thus the imaginary map).

kendall

kendall2

Posted by jrice @ 10:08 PM EST [Link]

Etc
Thoughts to start the week:

  • Academic readers who know my routine: Yes, yes. The listserv conditions are ripe right now for serious ranting. But I'll let it go for now. I had my say on the list, and if it gets any more nonsensical, I'll be back in the mix telling idiots to shut up.
  • What to do on Sunday in Detroit: Go to Dearborn. Have ice cream at Shatila, and then go next door to New Yasmeen for some nice dolmas.
  • Must make it to Dragonmead this week. I think I fell in love with a brewery.
  • Thoughts on the last Stars Wars (Yup. Only just saw it). Lucas can't write. And he can't direct. Seems like everyone gets to fight on a platform. If Yoda and Chewbacca already know each other, why don't they say "hi" when they meet up again in the Empire? Dooku? Is that the best name they could come up with?
  • The 10th anniversary of Netscape's IPO approaches. How long after that before Netscape crashed for good? 10 years of large-scale Internet browsing (12 if we go back to '93 and Mosaic) and most of academia already believes they have conquered the world of digital writing. So little time/so little learned. The unsettling of our media minds by something so vastly media-oriented complicates the 19th/20th century shift(s) we have been experiencing.
    What (and here is where composition studies doesn't get it) 19th and 20th century did to create media thinking - through the telegraph, Hollywood, Burroughs, avant-garde practices, Engelbart's windows, TV, New York hip hop of the '70s, etc. is what gave rise to the kind of logic that could make word processing possible (cut and paste). The Web pushes that logic further - mostly in ways we aren't yet sure what to do with. We see some of it in weblogs (even in so-called journals), but we see it in other approaches as well.
    Hmm. I smell rant. Better stop or just send this next time to the listserv.

    Posted by jrice @ 01:38 PM EST [Link]

    Sunday, July 24, 2005

    Cbd
    Gotcha!

    Posted by jrice @ 01:18 PM EST [Link]

    Michigan Beer Fest
    A few scenes:
    dragon1

    kuh

    drink

    fest1

    Posted by jrice @ 09:32 AM EST [Link]

    Thursday, July 21, 2005

    Fun With WordPress
    I've decided (for now - we still have until Sept 6, right?) to do my Intermediate Writing course this Fall as a WordPress setup. It can be found (still rough) at http://englishweb.clas.wayne.edu/~jrice/3010/.
    Even though I've been blogging since (almost) its inception, I've yet to consider using a blog as a course website. But the point has become obvious to most of us: the static webpage is vanishing (this after I just published an article on a new type of webpage pedagogy I invented!). We need new methods of organizing webspace. The blog is one such method (but not the only one). It has its limitations. But it might prove more dynamic as a space that can be written to throughout the semester by all, not just me.

    Posted by jrice @ 10:58 AM EST [Link]

    Wednesday, July 20, 2005

    Beer
    Money reports on Ratebeer.com's 50 best beers. Four of my favorites are in the top ten, Bell's (Michigan's and the country's best), Three Floyds (so close to Michigan, so far away; not one place stocks it), Stone (why oh why don't they ship to Michigan), and Dogfish (pure hops). The one beer I really want is Pizza Port, which I don't know if you can even get outside of Solana Beach, or the pizza place it's brewed at. America is in the lead when it comes to micros. Belgium is in the lead for heaven. America next. One beer missing from the list I love, Fish Tale. Another, Duchess. But then again, I also dig the low level Canadian take on Belgian style, Unibroue's Trois Pistoles.
    In the meantime, we've got the Michigan Summer Beer Fest on the schedule for Saturday. All Michigan beer, all day. You can't go wrong with that.

    Posted by jrice @ 07:57 AM EST [Link]

    Tuesday, July 19, 2005

    Larry
    Lots of anger of Larry Brown these past two days. "I got rich from writing crappy books" Mitch Albom basically says: seeya. But I'll miss Larry. Forget for a moment that he's a fellow member of the Tribe. He took the Pistons two years in a row to the finals when they couldn't get there without him. And Flip or no Flip, they will not go back next year without him. Watch Saunders have to play Darko serious minutes (in place of Dice?). That should be fun. A seven footer who can't rebound, block, shoot, or even run. Wow.
    Yeah, Brown's got the jimmy legs - always moving on. But was he really looking to get out? Or did ESPN merely ask the question enough ("Larry, are you going to Cleveland or not!") that we just assume he was out the door? News is not news until the station makes it so.

    Posted by jrice @ 06:01 PM EST [Link]

    CCCC Themes That Never Made It

  • Reflections, Responsibilities, and A Whole Bunch of Other Keywords
  • Access? I'll Give You Access!
  • Letting Us In/Letting Us Out
  • Who Wants to Party!
  • Angry Teachers/Angry Students
  • T(r)eachery
  • Self, Shmelf. Does Any of This Matter?
  • Making Our Work Matter Even More
  • Wasamatta With Teaching?
  • It's Hammer Time
  • Trial By Error: Next Time We'll Get it Right
  • Bad Hair Day
  • What We Do When We Do What Do
  • Writing, Wrotting, Wreeting
  • Who We've Been, Where We've Been, What We've Been, What We Want to Be, How We Will Be
  • I'll Teach You to Cry!
  • Entrances and Closures: Shutting Down Academia
  • Power Up/Power Down: Strengthening Our Weaknesses
  • Doody
  • Now You See Me Now You Don't
  • Let's Get It On

    Posted by jrice @ 02:15 PM EST [Link]

    Sunday, July 17, 2005

    Drupal
    Since the last two universities I was at refused to install PHP and Mysql, I've never had the luck to play with goodies like Drupal. I got a great admin at Wayne to get things running this past week, so I've started to mess around a bit in the hopes of getting something going for me, as well as for grad students who pass through the practicum I teach.
    But so far, I'm not getting out of Drupal what I want. I want more control over multiple blogs (it can't or I dont' see how these "blogs" function like the blogs we normally use) and ability to link to stand alone pages and such (not getting how yet) and having items only appear in one place and not on the main page as well (like a resource page you don't want on the main page). The template's style sheet can be manipulated, but some things can only be done through the fill in the blank interface.
    I've skimmed through some sites using Drupal for courses (and I know about the C&W workshop that recently took place), but am I missing something about its dynamics? Probably. But what?

    Posted by jrice @ 02:52 PM EST [Link]

    Saturday, July 16, 2005

    A KO
    Doing some research this morning on a track which I've been listening to for awhile now, A KO's "Soul 69". A nice remix of - what doesn't sound like Sam and Dave but is their song - "Hold On, I'm Coming." I got the track off of a Blue Water compliation some time last year. Who is this, I kept asking. American? English? So as I'm doing some writing this morning on the mix and the question of what I am now calling "Ka-knowledge" (named after the line in The Beastie's "Sounds of Science" - the mix as knowledge as opposed to literate practices of mastery and expertise), I find A KO's Livejournal.
    That is what Ka-knowledge is all about: the exploration of the link. The exploration. Not a definitive explication of that exploration.
    So, A KO, if you find my links, let me know what the track listings are, eh? Nice stuff. Is this track a riff on Arethra Franklin's album Soul '69?

    Posted by jrice @ 10:33 AM EST [Link]

    Friday, July 15, 2005

    The Yard Sale That's 792,000 Yards Long
    I've always wanted to experience this yard sale. A massive sale stretching throughout several states, it looks like the ultimate experience. Years ago, I saw a short PBS documentary on the sale and quickly imagined what kinds of great junk I could get: old tools, cast iron pans, cheap toys, comics nobody wants, furniture, board games named after long forgotten TV shows. This is the stuff one's life is made of: fill up your garage with "stuff" and you have made it.
    I love garage/yard sales. I love the idea of circulating junk. Unfortunately, I'm not the only one who likes these kinds of useless purchases; lots of folks do. Thus, the prices for crap can be quite high. In Micanopy (just down the road from Gainesville, where I used to live), Smiley's was notorious for jacking up the prices on what were once throwaway crap: McDonald's glasses, prizes from cereal boxes, little Happy Meals toys, sports giveaways. As I much as I desired this crap, I couldn't see myself paying 10 bucks for a glass that was once free.
    The next best thing to the garage sale is the flea market. But as great as the flea market is, it doesn't have the social-ness of the garage sale - the sale that takes place in someone's home. Here you can imagine all this crap once sitting inside the house, being used, being looked at, or just being tossed aside as an idiotic purchase ("Why did I buy yet another basket?").
    Flea markets were a Sunday ritual for me and my dad. He insisted we get up early (it gets hot quite early in Miami) and get there before everyone else. That usually meant we were there before the vendors. Of course, hot dogs and chili dogs can always be bought at 7:30 in the morning.
    A couple of weeks ago, we had a nice little yard sale run. I got Kill Bill on DVD for two dollars, a buffet for twenty dollars (and the guy drove it to my house in his pick-up), and some tools for a few dollars more (now I got that level I needed a month ago). In Michigan, the yard sale season is limited; no one wants to go or stand out in the snow and sell/buy junk. So I keep my eyes peeled when I drive around on the week-ends ("should I follow that sign? how deep into that neighborhood is the sale?" "hmm...I don't see any 'big ticket' items....should I get out of the car?"). I guess I don't feel that I own enough junk yet. Or I feel I don't want to own enough junk. I can't resist a torn comic book that features some odd topic or that is named after a forgotten B-movie; I can’t resist another wrench; I’m still looking for something cheap to put a lot of my junk in (like a tool chest or cabinet).
    And garage sales bring regret. Why didn’t I get that? Who cares if I really need it. I'm still kicking myself for not buying the five dollar wheelbarrow I saw two months ago.

    Posted by jrice @ 04:16 PM EST [Link]

    Thursday, July 14, 2005

    We're back.
    Will blog and rant soon....

    Posted by jrice @ 07:50 PM EST [Link]

    Friday, July 8, 2005

    Blog Job Seekers
    From that resource of dullness and everything non-intellectual, The Chronicle, a rant on why academic job seekers shouldn't blog:

    Worst of all, for professional academics, it's a publishing medium with no vetting process, no review board, and no editor. The author is the sole judge of what constitutes publishable material, and the medium allows for instantaneous distribution. After wrapping up a juicy rant at 3 a.m., it only takes a few clicks to put it into global circulation.

    Here we find the trope of the same useless argument: holy moley! Another kind of medium has emerged in a system dominated by the bloated and lengthy and never perfect peer review system. We can’t allow that! Or: we only need one outlet for expression, and that is the bloated and lengthy and never perfect peer review system. And no personal expression! (even though we assign “the essay” in all our classes; a medium whose origins are in personal expression – particularly as the developing culture of print encouraged such writing through self reflection/and re-reading). Fine. Been there done that. But here are the real gems of this piece:
  • Don't show any interest in technology. Otherwise, search committees know you obviously want to be a super geek techno wizard and not a professor.

    But the site quickly revealed that the true passion of said blogger's life was not academe at all, but the minutiae of software systems, server hardware, and other tech exotica. It's one thing to be proficient in Microsoft Office applications or HTML, but we can't afford to have our new hire ditching us to hang out in computer science after a few weeks on the job.

  • Academics shall have and post no interests outside of academia; i.e. academics should not be people and should not have thoughts about the world. If they do, they must be CRAZY.
    It would never occur to the committee to ask what a candidate thinks about certain people's choice of fashion or body adornment, which countries we should invade, what should be done to drivers who refuse to get out of the passing lane, what constitutes a real man, or how the recovery process from one's childhood traumas is going. But since the applicant elaborated on many topics like those, we were all ears. And we were a little concerned. It's not our place to make the recommendation, but we agreed a little therapy (of the offline variety) might be in order.

  • Search committees - supposedly those who are the experts at reasoning and logic - often make faulty decisions; they jump to conclusions with little evidence to support their position. Like, oh, let’s see, a blogger will spill the beans and tell everyone how ridiculous we are!

    The content of the blog may be less worrisome than the fact of the blog itself. Several committee members expressed concern that a blogger who joined our staff might air departmental dirty laundry (real or imagined) on the cyber clothesline for the world to see. Past good behavior is no guarantee against future lapses of professional decorum.

    The only thing revealing in this piece is that, once again, The Chronicle solicits or accepts work by folks who have No clue. It never once dawns on this academic (who, of course, refuses to use his real name; a popular Chronicle move for some reason - heaven forbid people know it was you who said something stupid) is that the reasoning his department uses may, in fact, be wrong. Is it possible that a group of folks looked at texts out of context and made illogical decisions? Possibly. Of course, this wouldn't be the first time that's happened in a job search, and blog or no blog, it won't be the only time a candidate gets rejected because the committee messed up in its decision process.

    Update:
    (hey, I never did any update before!)
    Collin adds to the discussion.
    Planned Obsolescence does as well.

    Posted by jrice @ 10:53 AM EST [Link]

    Thursday, July 7, 2005

    Everything Bad is Good for You

    Big shout out and thank you to Collin who sent me Steven Johnson's Everything Bad is Good for You for winning the 1000th comment contest. Johnson's book is a good read and a necessary read for anyone interested in thinking about media in complex ways.
    Johnson’s argument (in McLuhanist fashion) is that the content of media, like video games and television, does not affect us so much as the form of media does. That form, which encourages multi-threaded thinking, interactivity, complexity, and other features, has caused changes in how we structure and generate information. Instead of focusing on the violence or nudity such media display, we should think about how these media generate new rhetorical moves.
    I agree completely. One of the more interesting points throughout the book is the role complex one hour TV dramas play in our thinking habits. The ability to weave together many narrative threads at once and to identify patterns and connections among those threads (like we often do when we watch The Sopranos or Six Feet Under) is a rhetorical skill relevant for new media work. In that sense, it's a writing skill as well.

    The sharpening of the [average person's] mind can't be measured at the extremes of intellectual achievement. Instead, we should detect that improvement somewhere else, in the everyday realm of managing more complex forms of technology, mastering increasingly nuanced narrative structures - even playing more complicated video games. (156)

    This is the kind of thinking I often blog about in one of my many rants against contemporary composition pedagogy. Most textbooks and practices today work towards simplicity, not complexity. Whether it is in short pieces of writing students are asked to write (500 - 1,000 words) or whether it is what they write about (abortion, parking on campus, updated what I did last summer type essays) or whether it is the media form itself (paragraph by paragraph structure in which a topic sentence is required either at the beginning or at the beginning of every paragraph) or whether it is ideological (make your writing clear and coherent), simplicity is the norm. Contemporary media, as Johnson notes, is getting more and more complex. The discrepancy between our teaching and the media which shapes our thought and culture, therefore, is profound. We can get all antsy about national commission reports on writing all we want, but that is the wrong avenue to take; we need to start thinking more about media as writing and how media demands and pushes complex thinking and production. We need to stop fretting over how to measure ability (S.A.T., placement exam) and instead start designing curricula which works with and teaches to the logic of new media.

    Posted by jrice @ 11:08 AM EST [Link]

    Tuesday, July 5, 2005

    Nvu
    Anybody out there playing with Nvu yet? Got any feedback?

    Posted by jrice @ 10:40 AM EST [Link]

    Public Image Ltd
    In Clancy's post on Fulkerson for the carnival, she asks "So What?". So what indeed. Part of Fulkerson's "so what" is to critique the role of cultural studies (wrong content/not enough writing, etc. argument). Another part of the so what Fulkerson proposes is the public image angle. Who are we? How do we represent ourselves? Here the quest is internal: what is it we do? On the WPA-L listserv, the response is often: how do we represent ourselves to the public sphere?
    To the latter position (the public image) - I might ask: so what? So what if yet another national report bemoans the "awful" state of writing today? So what if yet another national commission gets our work wrong? Typically, the response is that we need to correct the image problem. That, I contend, is a battle you cannot win. You cannot win because no one really cares what the correct image is. These reports, as I've noted before, are diversions. They are meant to divert attention from the real problems writing instruction (and education in general) faces:

  • Over abundance of unskilled, poorly paid labor
  • Lack of incentive for innovation and development (especially in the so-called "teaching" schools/ as opposed to the so-called research schools)
  • Inability to deal with complex positions and theoretical proposals (as opposed to the "practice" we hear emphasized everywhere)
  • Heavy teaching loads and over crowded classrooms
  • Fear of technology
  • Obsession with standardized testing
  • Obsession with standardizing assessment
    And the list goes on. As long as you write long-winded, say nothing new, reports, you don’t have to deal with any of these issues. And you distract the members of the profession enough ("How dare they say that about us! Let’s get 'em!") that the profession doesn’t think about the real issues for awhile longer.
    Internally, as well, we don't want to embrace our image as it reflects back on us. Instead, we cling to romantic notions of martyrdom ("no one appreciates us") or heroics ("ah, the pioneers who really set things up for us"). Public critique of our self-image ("Listen, we’re not that great, and we have to deal with all of this…") are typically met with silence or hostility.
    If we must respond to our public image, we should, at least, push the labor issues to the foreground. But that won't happen. We are guilty of keeping the labor problems alive and well. We are all "boss compositionists" to some extent.
    So what? Good question.

    Posted by jrice @ 09:25 AM EST [Link]

    Sunday, July 3, 2005

    Sunday Travels
    Inspired by Detroit Blog's Delray trip, we went down there today and snapped some pics (Jenny got chased by ghetto dogs at one point...sorry I don't have a picture of that). Some are also only on the Flickr page. Aftwerwards, we stopped off at Shatila Bakery in Dearborn for excellent ice cream and pastries.
    rib_delray

    love_is_a_drink

    delray2

    angel2

    Posted by jrice @ 12:54 PM EST [Link]

    Friday, July 1, 2005

    Fall Practicum
    Working on this Fall's Practicum. Adding some texts and made the course more technology centered. With the grant I got, I should be setting up Drupal/and or Moodle and probably WordPress for grad students as well.

    Posted by jrice @ 03:37 PM EST [Link]

    Review
    A review of Writing About Cool and my response are now online at the Resource Center For Cyberculture Studies site.

    Posted by jrice @ 09:48 AM EST [Link]

  • [Archive Index] [Main Index]

    Powered By Greymatter