My Archives: December 2004
Sunday, December 26, 2004
For those who iz about to be interviewed:
![]()
Posted by jrice @ 04:04 PM EST [Link]
The Unbearable Lightness of Pedagogy
Taken from Kundera’s Dictionary of Misunderstood Words in The Unbearable Lightness of Being, an update for the discipline in honor of the ending year. I.e. a top ten (without reaching ten) countdown of disciplinary misunderstood words; the Yellow Dog Remix.Grading. Academic blogs love to complete the semester with odes to grading pains. “Finally!” “Students get worse every semester.” “I’m so busy grading.” The grade, the degree, the level, of complaints rise among the most disappointed pedagogues. Amid all the kvetching, though, no one stops to grade themselves: quality of instruction (F), innovative teaching (F), interesting assignments with context and reason to do (F). MLA. Not too much modern about the Modern Language Association, its history rooted in disciplinary identity as well as national identity (literature and language mark the nation state, a late concept for American culture). Today’s identity is cyber, not literary. To be fully modern, the MLA needs to include scripts and code. The Society for HTML. The Organization of Perl Studies. Plagiarism. Imagine Madlib in a composition classroom. Imagine Picasso claiming Las Meninas as his own. Imagine Robert Johnson trying to write “Traveling Riverside Blues.” “But these are artistic practices,” plagiarism police argue. “They are not exemplary of academic writing.” Ok. You just proved my point. Professional Writing. Why is the university set up for the creation of a professional class? Literacy. But, as many show, one does not have to be immersed in literacy (or at least, print literacy) to be professional. Fast Food Nation’s strongest point is that none of the early innovators in fast food and franchising had college degrees or even completed high school. Writing instruction is obsessed with being professional. Yet, its vision of professionalism often is a mythology, an assumption taken for granted as truth. The mythology of genre (essays, memos, usability) and “purpose” overcomes and prevents knowledge creation. It’s a problematic As if situation: as if professional discourse has nothing to do with rhetoric or invention. Blog. Has come to be confused with emancipation. The new media faux pas. We saw it in hypertext, too. Blog is but a genre, a space, one – of many – ways to create writing online. Its usefulness gets shadowed by infatuation (I BLOG YOU BLOG WE BLOG). Missionary zeal over rhetorical output. The critics love it because it’s easy to use the zeal as cause for dismissal: “Ah, it’s just a fad. What will be the next big thing?” In the meantime, even more so than was the case with hypertext and web page construction, millions of these writing spaces come to live across the Web, connecting and sharing information in all kinds of interesting, boring, profound, provocative, collective ways. Everyone gets to participate. Except students, of course.
Posted by jrice @ 02:02 PM EST [Link]
Saturday, December 25, 2004
Escaping the Delta
Reading:
Escaping the Delta: Robert Johnson and the Invention of the Blues. Interesting for its take on "other histories"; Johnson is not the product of Delta clichés and tropes (poor Black underclass searching out vehicles of expression within a dominant, oppressive culture) but rather the product of an overall effort to create pop music in a specific time period. Robert Johnson wanted to be a crooner. Elijah Wald wants us to rethink the blues, and blues history, as just another effort to create pop music. Taste in place of romanticism.
Like anything, there are lessons to be learned. The obvious lesson is that of the "grand narrative," Lyotard's critique of those sweeping gestures we readily adopt and believe in. Wald challenges the grand narrative of blues. We might just as well challenge composition's grand narrative (my own efforts are in The Rhetoric of Cool). Or we might challenge those narratives we construct around the concept of writing as well, what Wald is trying to do for the composition of blues, we might think about regarding writing in general or even more narrowly, what we have come to accept as "student writing." This is my own trope. If you read this blog, you see it repeated ad nausea. Much apologies. But point not yet taken.
We also, those of us folk dedicated to composition, still have a romanticized vision of writing and writing instruction. Wald's larger lesson is how such romanticizing gestures unfortunately discredit other kinds of gestures in circulation. Por ejemplo: So what if Robert Johnson wasn't really representative of a "true" Delta sound? The question is not trying to minimize nor erase Johnson's influence and importance, but rather to de-romanticize a specific version of Delta music so that other understandings may emerge, even if those understandings generate uncomfortable histories (Wha wha wha…Skip James and Son House were not well known in their time???).
In turn, we might de-romanticize the visions of student authorship circulated and accepted so that other kinds of writings might emerge. Easily said. But the very fact that I situate this point within a book about a blues musician is what complicates the whole issue. Who is going to treat this analogy as serious? Not too many folks. The romantic hold we place on specific types of student writing (what Bartholomae has canonized as inventing the university and Sirc has done the best job to displace with a variety of alternative situations) is strong. Displacements, of course, are intellectual exercises. Robert Ray often imagines the “what if” as an exercise in filmic possibility. Breton created his own alternatives evoked by the random encounter. Marvel comics did the same in super hero match ups (“What if Spider Man was a Girl?”). Wald extends that move to the blues, and we and those we work with in the classroom should as well; the Web’s network of links and connections offers a viable media outlet.
Posted by jrice @ 08:30 PM EST [Link]
Wednesday, December 22, 2004
Composition Stubbornness
Composition studies is stubborn.
Its stubbornness resembles, at times, the movie industry and music industry clamping down on p2p. Rather than try to understand how p2p is changing the nature of reception, entertainment, distribution, and production, the industry tries to shut down the entire p2p operations as illegal and exemplary of copyright infringement. That copyright, as so many have now written online and elsewhere, may be the product itself of a different logic and different time period (early print culture and the invention of book manufacturing and selling) and now be in need of an update doesn't matter to p2p foes. It's wrong. Stop it now.
We see that stubbornness repeated in composition studies. Those that view specific legacies and models of instruction as still relevant as is in the digital age are as stubborn as the industrial giants that fight p2p applications. "But it is our responsibility to teach clarity and well crafted prose," many cry out. “Nothing is more important than teaching the essay.” “Where’s your thesis!” A good deal of that composition desire is legitimate, as is the desire to continue to make a living selling entertainment. But how the vague concepts of clarity and well-crafted writing are understood in light of technological change still does not spark much interest. That there exist logics which structure our understanding of culture, rhetoric, and writing, and that those logics shift eventually under technological change is a lost point. No one gives a damn. “Our students just can’t write,” is the only response these folks can think of.
Those in this game for some time respond in cynical fashion (circulating their so-called "experience" as tropes for credibility): "Ah, we used to think ‘radical’ stuff mattered. We've learned our lesson since. You are so naïve."
Others respond in instrumental fashion: "Our purpose is not to teach how to make web pages. We're writing teachers."
And still even among the newly convinced, we find instrumental reasoning governing the teaching of technology and writing, this reasoning is rooted in a disciplinary stubbornness to move beyond print paradigms: “In this assignment you will analyze several websites/weblogs and point out their audience, purpose, etc” or: “Design a website for X business using usability testing and web standards. Identify the audience and purpose for your project.”
And yet, this stubbornness doesn't seem to get the complainers anywhere but deeper mired in a culture of disappointment and dissatisfaction. For others, the stubbornness fabricates a feeling of being digital, even if the methods and ideologies dictating this “new” work are almost the same as that which came before blogs, websites, or Flash.
WPA-L has become a solid example of this occurring. CCCC another locale.
These days, I feel like I make my living yelling at and critiquing that stubbornness. There is something very dissatisfying in that as well.
I have seen certain folks throw up their hands and walk away, staying within the field but refusing to contribute any longer to a stubborn discursive structure hostile to ideas different than its own. I have seen others who are within composition simply ignore composition.
This is too long an entry, I know. And I could say more regarding this stubbornness, that it really isn’t a new phenomenon at all, that its roots extend back to the invention of the field and become pronounced in the early and mid 1960s. But enough for now. I got a Detroit snow storm to await and a new book about the other side of Robert Johnson to read (and comment on later).
Posted by jrice @ 03:36 PM EST [Link]
Monday, December 20, 2004
The World of the Link
Chuck shows me that Amazon is enacting the link in all kinds of odd, scary, and yet provocative ways. On Amazon, he found a listing for his blog. I'm immediately intrigued, of course, so I start seeing what else is up in terms of Yellow Dog. I couldn't find a listing for Yellow Dog like his; this is all I find. A slot, but no picture - Chuck's listing has a screen shot of his site. I do see at the bottom of this listing my old Gainesville address and phone number. That's spooky.
Through a general Amazon search, I also find:
Amazon is now tracking, through its search engine A9, not just my site - or any other - but the peripherals of the site, like images. Only six images pop up for my site (I have more still online). But the consequences loom large for this linking. What comes after the linking to of images?
The WPA-L recent back and forth of subliteracy speaks to these consequences. It's still fairly difficult for composition to imagine new logics emerging out of new media. Bring up the digital, and the response will focus only on a weblog assignment or making a webpage. But there is more to this digital game. Amazon understands that quite well. They - and Google - work hard to create a world of small pieces loosely joined. Their goal is obviously commerce. But so what? The question of linking and connectivity, what Collin is going to teach regarding the network at Syracuse, extends beyond the commercial appeal of viral marketing, synergy, or any other related concept. When voices proclaim today's students as subliterate, I can imagine (and this is an act of imagining, of course, b/c I do not know what many of these instructors teach) a course which resists the interlinking logics of new media. Thesis driven work is the most obvious example. Singe authored compositions fall quickly behind. Hierarchical reasoning’s in this mix too, as is argumentative writing.
Do ALL students who write poorly do so because of a mismatched pedagogy - one which forces print logic (represented loosely by the thesis example) onto new media beings (those who understand the networked society in very explicit and implicit ways)? Of course not. But that mismatch exists and is dominant in maintaining problematic pedagogy. The real question continues to be: Why is Amazon the one to understand the network and pedagogy the one to not understand? Financial motivation? Sure. Something else? Of course: ideology. Composition has a lot at stake ideologically. And breaking ideological holds is difficult to accomplish. But think about it for a minute: that Amazon knows my old Gainesville address may be frightening in terms of privacy, but it’s also fascinating in how this linking logic finds/makes connections where connections would not be obvious nor would they appear. The connection, the interlinked network of information which bends and changes, which drops information and adds new information in very unpredictable ways – that is the key to composing and intellectual work. For Amazon, that knowledge translates into marketing. For a writing student (or even, ahem, professor), that knowledge will manifest in other ways. There is a great deal to learn from the Amazon example.
Posted by jrice @ 02:47 PM EST [Link]
Sunday, December 19, 2004
So Cold
and the northern portions of my- Tom Waits "Emotional Weather Report"
ability to deal rationally with my
disconcerted precarious emotional
situation, it's cold out there

Posted by jrice @ 04:31 PM EST [Link]
Thursday, December 16, 2004
Old School
The Yellow Dog blog is starting to feel old school these days. In the comments, flashes from the past: Riley, Doan, Goodwin.
Dilger's been here before. No surprise there. If only Greg blogged. Invent-L should switch to blog format.
Florida folks don't do a good enough job staying connected (or I don't do a good enough job. . .)
We should assemble the UF Networked Writing Blog for the Gator Nation of theory, rhetoric, lit, media, and other English Studies' assemblages.
In the meantime, listen to this.
Posted by jrice @ 06:55 PM EST [Link]
Wednesday, December 15, 2004
Sayings I Invented Part I
Posted by jrice @ 11:42 AM EST [Link]
Tuesday, December 14, 2004
Lists
Someone told me today that my first post sucked. So here’s another effort:
A list, inspired by Spin.
I have a hate/love relationship with lists. Maybe it’s the Roland Barthes in me (likes and disklikes; I dislike lists as I construct a list about this dislike...). But I do like music lists for how they allow you to write about music in funny and insightful ways (ok, I will do neither here).
Here’s my list for best 2004 new music which is most likely not new at all since I’m late to the trends.
I was cooling at the park with a couple of other Jukies
An animated glitch suspended like milk money bullies
I calculate my comfort zone by how baggy the hoodie
I calibrate pyrotechnics on how crappy the jewelry
(I keep it Dirty) Like What? My vibes on that old "Ha ha ha Stick 'Em"
Like a 1950-something wire hanger abortion victim
99 bottles of happy pills on the wall
Take 'em down, pass 'em around before me and MURS eat 'em all
Posted by jrice @ 09:16 PM EST [Link]
Notes in No Real Order or Reason
Songs about drinking and thinking:
"Warm Beer and Cold Women" - Tom Waits
"Cigarettes and Coffee" - Otis
What is it about popular music always speaking about Wichita? Something in the American imaginary about Kansas? Why not Des Moines? Or Titusville?
From the White Stripes:
I'm going to Wichita
Far from this opera for evermore
I'm gonna work the straw
Make the sweat drip out of every pore
And Glenn Campbell:
I am a lineman for the county and I drive the main road
Searchin' in the sun for another overload
I hear you singin' in the wire, I can hear you through the whine
And the Wichita Lineman is still on the line
and who can forget the Witchita State fighting song!
All Hail! Hai! Wichita
U Rah! Rah! Rah for Wichita
March onward, banners high
With courage, force that can never die.
Rah! We'll fight for Wichita
Brave spirits never fail
To Wichita all loyalty
Hail! Our varsity, triumphantly hail!
Jeffrey Williams un-tangles the academic history of "smart," "rigor," and "interesting."
The promise of smart is that it purports to be a way to talk about quality in a sea of quantity. But the problem is that it internalizes the competitive ethos of the university, aiming not for the cultivation of intelligence but for individual success in the academic market.
Me, I prefer funky and cool to smart and rigor. I embrace the James Brown mantra "Make it Funky" for academia. In place of rigor, let's teach funkiness. Let's teach everybody to be on "the one." Instead of teachers, we need funky drummers!
Seriously.
Posted by jrice @ 12:43 PM EST [Link]
Sunday, December 12, 2004
Sunday
Look up, Saj, your star is rising. You don't need some wise man dressed up in a robe to point out that the world is turning. (Maybe even revolving around you!) Now, along comes Venus in a little elf suit to offer a leg up. (So to speak.) It's all very flattering, of course. But is it wise? Santa's no fool. Will you be naughty? Or will you be nice?
Santa Claus? I ain't no Christian! Naughty eh? Now we’re talking…
Posted by jrice @ 08:45 AM EST [Link]
Saturday, December 11, 2004
Editive
Editive lets you edit web pages in your browser. Save, upload. Pretty wild stuff.
Posted by jrice @ 02:01 PM EST [Link]
Wednesday, December 8, 2004
Lil inspiration from here.
Yellow Dog iPod
Posted by jrice @ 07:13 PM EST [Link]
Tuesday, December 7, 2004
Now, what lesson are we going to learn here?
(Thanks, Brendan for posting this to WPA)
Gee, mom. I didn't realize stealing was wrong....
Posted by jrice @ 09:05 AM EST [Link]
Sports Roundup
Sometimes I wish I was an NBA scout or a columnist for the Free Press (or maybe a semi-regular on Around the Horn).
Posted by jrice @ 08:47 AM EST [Link]
Monday, December 6, 2004
Dylan
Dylan on 60 Minutes last night:
So how did you write these great songs?
Dunno
Are you the greatest?
Dunno. Who knows?
What were you trying to say back then?
Who knows. Something, I guess. I just said it
A writing pedagogy of no-knowledge. Love it.
Posted by jrice @ 01:12 PM EST [Link]
Saturday, December 4, 2004
My Name Is
Collin writes:
I'm tempted here to suggest that knowing the results of an egosurf (Googling your name) is to new media/electracy what being able to sign your name is to literacy.
Very interesting post (as usual). To expand, I'm fascinated by the equation of the name with some kind of new media
literate (for want of a better term) act. For next semester, I had wanted to include Derrida's Signeponge as part of my Digital Literacy course, so that we could think about the name in relationship to new media (alter egos/naming/etc.). The alter ego seems an unrecognized aspect of new media which, at best, has been trivialized in the likes of Turkle’s (and followers) work which tends to settle on the so-called MOO instance of identity theft. Signeponge seemed ideal for how it plays with the signature in ways digital culture encourages. But – Derrida’s book is out of print. So - I've shifted focus for that part of the course to the celebrity - Dead Elvis indicating the role celebrity culture plays in shaping digital literate practices (for this text, the issue of referential collage). Elvis as signature is not Elvis as person. Instead, we witness the Baudrillard “cool” discourse of commutation enacted within popular culture (via the celebrity name).
But the egosurf, as Collin notes, is just as interesting. I'm reminded of the wonderful film The Sweetest Sound, Alan Berliner's documentary of how his own egosurf becomes a dinner for those who share his name. What would it be to engage those who share your name?
My Name Is as the Warhol moment of digital culture? The collagist experience of naming? Yo. Eminem as grammatologist of new media?
The signature – borrowed from Derrida – is the new media egosurf. Zadie Smith’s The Autograph Man exemplifies the move from popular culture to celebritacy. We are no longer literate, but celibratate: signatures of popular culture and technology. Googlesurfs. “What happens when you google your name?” You are engaging with the technological other, the digital you, the link, the Shaviro world which is Connected, the new media apparatus. The question of celebritacy. Everyone is no longer famous for 15 minutes, but instead, we are famous as long as we are googled.
Posted by jrice @ 10:28 PM EST [Link]
Friday, December 3, 2004
What a Man Ought to Know
From Harvard's Open Collections Program:
Y'all got any ideas?
Posted by jrice @ 07:29 PM EST [Link]
Wednesday, December 1, 2004
The Rhetoric of Linking
To continue where I done left off....
Hypertext theory's biggest failure, it seems, is to put all its money in narrative. That the visible hypertext folks (mostly affiliated with Eastgate) continue to see hypertext as only a way to tell complex stories is indicative of the initial interest in hypertext coming from literary studies. Composition, on the other hand, a more viable field for thinking about linking, connectivity, interactivity, and, of course, rhetoric, has failed to show much interest in hypertext. Yes, we have seem some initial studies (Slatin/Johndan) but then the well dries up, the courses never integrate the logic of hypertext into their curricula, and the field gets bogged down with the issue of time (I HAVE NO TIME TO TEACH HTML).
Which is a pity. The link. Nelson's early understanding that all information/ideas are "intertwingled." WAC never got the concept down (each discipline to its own area of study), and writing instruction as told by the textbook industry still struggles to break out of formula more suited to individual writing done by individual writers (who occupy individual identities - that of the student).
But the link is what makes the Web so exciting and weird. The metafilters, waxys, boing boings, and, of course, weblogs, which gather and sort the vast amount of information out there. . . these sites transform the Web into a text of linkings and interlinkings. The Web generates a rhetoric which has little to nothing to do with “non-narrative” and more to do with the network – the complex intersection of thought. But unlike the linking set up in the web versions of television (CNN ABC), the link engines connect with the unfamiliar as well as the familiar. When the familiar becomes overlinked, it, too, becomes common to us all. But we get a so-called alternative that is quite expansive and overpowering, a galaxy of constellations, a mosaic, as McLuhan writes.
So why not teach this writing?
Posted by jrice @ 10:37 AM EST [Link]